Section 4.1-4.2, due November 4

For the most part, this section made sense. The one part that was a little confusing was that the inverse of x/ln(x) is an approximation to p(n). However, looking on it a little more helped make more sense from it.

Something interesting was the need for complex analysis at first to prove the prime number theorem. I found that very interesting considering how I would, before this class, not consider how the complex numbers and integers are related. Perhaps it goes back to those modular forms taking numbers in N and mapping them to elements of C.